
“Jon Stewart so pithily articulated the argument that once it was made, it was really hard to do anything else."
--Robert Thompson, professor of television at Syracuse University; "In ‘Daily Show’ Role on 9/11 Bill, Echoes of Murrow" (The New York Times, 12/26/2010)
Oddly, the person who Stewart reminds me most of is Ronald ("we begin bombing in five minutes") Reagan, circa late 1970's.
A two-term California governor and a fixture on the political right for decades, Reagan had yet to be embraced by the mainstream.
Instead, he was derided as a washed-up actor of dubious intelligence, who may or may not also be a trigger-happy cowboy.
Posthumously, Reagan is warmly remembered as The Great Communicator, a man with a genuinely sunny disposition and bedrock principles who guided the country into and through a period of national prosperity -- and not incidentally, a successful resolution of the Cold War.
(Sorry, lefties, he did.)
Stewart's Ascent
It's a bit hard to see Stewart's new-found stature, both because Stewart is a contemporary, and because his credentials -- in this case, as a wise-cracking satirist and media personality -- can also be easily dismissed by the opposite end of the political spectrum (ask now-U.S. Senator Al Franken whether his comedian background helped his candidacy).
But as evidenced by this month's 9/11 legislation, Stewart's growing influence -- culturally, politically, etc. -- is for real.
Amongst all our other problems, perhaps lack of leadership is the most acute.
If we can cultivate a couple more "senior statesmen-types" like Jon Stewart in the next few years, there's cause for optimism.
P.S.: Maybe it was the "avuncular" thing, or that "Walter" sounds so, well, senior citizen-like.
Or perhaps it was just because I happened to be 8 years old at the time.
But it sure seemed like Cronkite was older than 52 when he pronounced Vietnam a lost cause in 1968 -- barely older than Stewart's now 48 years old.